A while back, I did some writing about despised Bible characters. I added a similar post last year about Obadiah.
I think that the reason for this I’ve heard preaching or teaching about these characters that doesn’t treat them as real people: they are either utterly evil (Saul, for example) or else really wonderful (David).
This time, I want to write about Cain.
Let’s be clear: Cain was wicked; he did kill his brother Abel, apparently in a jealous rage. It is the events leading up to this that I want to think about. Let’s look at the story:
And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD. And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering: But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell. And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen? If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him. (Gen 4:3-7)
I’ve heard it said that Cain and Abel were told that they needed to bring a blood sacrifice, and that Abel obeyed the instruction, but Cain refused, substituting his own ideas. However, this is not supported by the text above: why would Cain be “very wroth” when the LORD had respect to Abel’s offering? If I ask you for a saw, and you decide to bring me a hammer, and I don’t take it, why would you be angry? You know you didn’t bring me what I asked for. However, if I ask a couple of people for tools, and one brings me a saw and another brings me a hammer, and I enjoy and use the saw and not the hammer (I “have respect” to the saw and the one that brought it), then the guy who brought me the hammer may have some reason to be angry. If Cain KNEW he was bringing something that was not valid as an offering, he had no reason at all to be “very wroth”.
Cain’s response indicates that he thought the LORD was being arbitrary: he probably reasoned that he was just as sincere as Abel; his offering was just as good (or better) than Abel’s offering. Moreover, Cain was the oldest brother, and his offering should have been accepted first. There was no reason, he probably thought, for the LORD accepting Abel’s sacrifice and not his. As his wrath grew, he probably reasoned that the LORD was merely “playing favorites” by respecting Abel’s offering, and this may led Cain to hate Abel.
(Note concerning the sacrifice: we know from Hebrews 11 that Abel’s sacrifice was “more excellent” than Cain’s sacrifice. I assume, as I think most do, that it was “more excellent” because it was a better picture of the sacrifice of God’s only begotten Son, Jesus Christ, on Calvary.)
The LORD graciously told Cain that he [Cain] had no reason to be angry; he could acquire an animal from Abel’s flock and offer it, and then his offering would be accepted. It is wonderful of God that He allows us second chances (and sometimes multiple chances!).
We only know that the next thing that happened was that Cain talked with Abel and then killed him. Cain may have started out negotiating with Abel for one of the flock. Perhaps Abel, not realizing that Cain was seething inside, innocently poked a little fun at Cain’s offering. In any event, it came about that Cain killed Abel.
It’s just something to think about.